County Data
Coahoma County, Mississippi
Self-reliance and preparedness data for Coahoma County
Relatively Moderate
Hazard Risk (16.1/100)
Good
Solar (4.5 kWh/m²/day)
Natural Hazard Risks in Coahoma County
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Tornado | Relatively High | 34.8 |
| Heat Wave | Relatively High | 25.3 |
| Strong Wind | Relatively Moderate | 17.4 |
| Lightning | Relatively Moderate | 17.3 |
| Drought | Relatively Moderate | 15.0 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index. Scores 0–100, higher = more risk.
Climate Profile
Temperature & Growing Season
| January Avg | 36°F |
Water & Energy
| Annual Precipitation | 5.9″ |
| Solar Potential | 4.5 kWh/m²/day |
| Wind Speed | 2.3 m/s |
| Soil Type | Silt Loam |
Local Species
62
Edible species
27
Medicinal species
52
Autonomy Score
Get Your Coahoma County Guide
Enter any zip code in Coahoma County for a full location-specific guide with planting calendars, foraging data, water strategy, and personalized action plans.
Full guide from $14.99 — printable, offline-ready
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the biggest natural hazards in Coahoma County, Mississippi?
- Coahoma County has an overall hazard rating of Relatively Moderate based on FEMA National Risk Index data. The top threats are Tornado, Heat Wave, Strong Wind. Each hazard is scored 0–100 by likelihood and expected impact.
- Is Coahoma County good for solar power?
- Coahoma County has a good solar rating. Solar potential is based on average daily irradiance (kWh/m²/day), which determines how much energy rooftop or ground-mounted panels can produce year-round.
- How many edible plants grow in Coahoma County?
- Our database identifies 62 edible plant species in Coahoma County based on regional flora data, USDA hardiness zone, and iNaturalist observations. The full field guide includes identification notes, preparation methods, and seasonal availability.
- What is the autonomy score for Coahoma County?
- Coahoma County has an autonomy score of 52. This composite score measures local self-reliance potential across water access, food production capacity, energy resources, and supply chain resilience. Higher scores indicate greater potential for self-sufficiency.