County Data
Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota
Self-reliance and preparedness data for Lac qui Parle County
Relatively Low
Hazard Risk (9.2/100)
Moderate
Solar (4.0 kWh/m²/day)
Natural Hazard Risks in Lac qui Parle County
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Cold Wave | Relatively High | 33.3 |
| Drought | Relatively Moderate | 19.7 |
| Winter Weather | Relatively Low | 13.7 |
| Strong Wind | Relatively Low | 13.2 |
| Tornado | Relatively Low | 11.6 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index. Scores 0–100, higher = more risk.
Climate Profile
Temperature & Growing Season
| January Avg | 10°F |
Water & Energy
| Annual Precipitation | 0.9″ |
| Solar Potential | 4.0 kWh/m²/day |
| Wind Speed | 3.5 m/s |
| Soil Type | Loam |
Local Species
60
Edible species
25
Medicinal species
49
Autonomy Score
Get Your Lac qui Parle County Guide
Enter any zip code in Lac qui Parle County for a full location-specific guide with planting calendars, foraging data, water strategy, and personalized action plans.
Full guide from $14.99 — printable, offline-ready
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the biggest natural hazards in Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota?
- Lac qui Parle County has an overall hazard rating of Relatively Low based on FEMA National Risk Index data. The top threats are Cold Wave, Drought, Winter Weather. Each hazard is scored 0–100 by likelihood and expected impact.
- Is Lac qui Parle County good for solar power?
- Lac qui Parle County has a moderate solar rating. Solar potential is based on average daily irradiance (kWh/m²/day), which determines how much energy rooftop or ground-mounted panels can produce year-round.
- How many edible plants grow in Lac qui Parle County?
- Our database identifies 60 edible plant species in Lac qui Parle County based on regional flora data, USDA hardiness zone, and iNaturalist observations. The full field guide includes identification notes, preparation methods, and seasonal availability.
- What is the autonomy score for Lac qui Parle County?
- Lac qui Parle County has an autonomy score of 49. This composite score measures local self-reliance potential across water access, food production capacity, energy resources, and supply chain resilience. Higher scores indicate greater potential for self-sufficiency.