County Data
Martin County, Minnesota
Self-reliance and preparedness data for Martin County
Relatively Moderate
Hazard Risk (14.2/100)
Moderate
Solar (4.0 kWh/m²/day)
Natural Hazard Risks in Martin County
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Cold Wave | Relatively High | 36.8 |
| Drought | Relatively High | 29.5 |
| Winter Weather | Relatively High | 29.0 |
| Tornado | Relatively Moderate | 18.2 |
| Hail | Relatively Moderate | 17.5 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index. Scores 0–100, higher = more risk.
Climate Profile
Temperature & Growing Season
| January Avg | 12°F |
Water & Energy
| Annual Precipitation | 2.2″ |
| Solar Potential | 4.0 kWh/m²/day |
| Wind Speed | 3.6 m/s |
| Soil Type | Loam |
Local Species
60
Edible species
25
Medicinal species
50
Autonomy Score
Get Your Martin County Guide
Enter any zip code in Martin County for a full location-specific guide with planting calendars, foraging data, water strategy, and personalized action plans.
Full guide from $14.99 — printable, offline-ready
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the biggest natural hazards in Martin County, Minnesota?
- Martin County has an overall hazard rating of Relatively Moderate based on FEMA National Risk Index data. The top threats are Cold Wave, Drought, Winter Weather. Each hazard is scored 0–100 by likelihood and expected impact.
- Is Martin County good for solar power?
- Martin County has a moderate solar rating. Solar potential is based on average daily irradiance (kWh/m²/day), which determines how much energy rooftop or ground-mounted panels can produce year-round.
- How many edible plants grow in Martin County?
- Our database identifies 60 edible plant species in Martin County based on regional flora data, USDA hardiness zone, and iNaturalist observations. The full field guide includes identification notes, preparation methods, and seasonal availability.
- What is the autonomy score for Martin County?
- Martin County has an autonomy score of 50. This composite score measures local self-reliance potential across water access, food production capacity, energy resources, and supply chain resilience. Higher scores indicate greater potential for self-sufficiency.