County Data
Tangipahoa County, Louisiana
Self-reliance and preparedness data for Tangipahoa County
Relatively Moderate
Hazard Risk (17.8/100)
Good
Solar (4.7 kWh/m²/day)
Natural Hazard Risks in Tangipahoa County
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Riverine Flooding | Relatively High | 26.7 |
| Lightning | Relatively Moderate | 25.4 |
| Tornado | Relatively Moderate | 19.6 |
| Hurricane | Relatively Moderate | 17.7 |
| Winter Weather | Relatively Moderate | 16.8 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index. Scores 0–100, higher = more risk.
Climate Profile
Temperature & Growing Season
| January Avg | 47°F |
Water & Energy
| Annual Precipitation | 7.1″ |
| Solar Potential | 4.7 kWh/m²/day |
| Wind Speed | 0.4 m/s |
| Soil Type | Silt Loam |
Local Species
62
Edible species
27
Medicinal species
52
Autonomy Score
Get Your Tangipahoa County Guide
Enter any zip code in Tangipahoa County for a full location-specific guide with planting calendars, foraging data, water strategy, and personalized action plans.
Full guide from $14.99 — printable, offline-ready
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the biggest natural hazards in Tangipahoa County, Louisiana?
- Tangipahoa County has an overall hazard rating of Relatively Moderate based on FEMA National Risk Index data. The top threats are Riverine Flooding, Lightning, Tornado. Each hazard is scored 0–100 by likelihood and expected impact.
- Is Tangipahoa County good for solar power?
- Tangipahoa County has a good solar rating. Solar potential is based on average daily irradiance (kWh/m²/day), which determines how much energy rooftop or ground-mounted panels can produce year-round.
- How many edible plants grow in Tangipahoa County?
- Our database identifies 62 edible plant species in Tangipahoa County based on regional flora data, USDA hardiness zone, and iNaturalist observations. The full field guide includes identification notes, preparation methods, and seasonal availability.
- What is the autonomy score for Tangipahoa County?
- Tangipahoa County has an autonomy score of 52. This composite score measures local self-reliance potential across water access, food production capacity, energy resources, and supply chain resilience. Higher scores indicate greater potential for self-sufficiency.