County Data
Chesterfield County, South Carolina
Self-reliance and preparedness data for Chesterfield County
Relatively Low
Hazard Risk (11.6/100)
Good
Solar (4.6 kWh/m²/day)
Natural Hazard Risks in Chesterfield County
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Tornado | Relatively Moderate | 23.2 |
| Ice Storm | Relatively Moderate | 22.9 |
| Strong Wind | Relatively Moderate | 18.6 |
| Lightning | Relatively Moderate | 18.4 |
| Hurricane | Relatively Moderate | 13.9 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index. Scores 0–100, higher = more risk.
Climate Profile
Temperature & Growing Season
| January Avg | 40°F |
Water & Energy
| Annual Precipitation | 4.3″ |
| Solar Potential | 4.6 kWh/m²/day |
| Wind Speed | 1.9 m/s |
| Soil Type | Sandy Loam |
Local Species
62
Edible species
27
Medicinal species
52
Autonomy Score
Get Your Chesterfield County Guide
Enter any zip code in Chesterfield County for a full location-specific guide with planting calendars, foraging data, water strategy, and personalized action plans.
Full guide from $14.99 — printable, offline-ready
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the biggest natural hazards in Chesterfield County, South Carolina?
- Chesterfield County has an overall hazard rating of Relatively Low based on FEMA National Risk Index data. The top threats are Tornado, Ice Storm, Strong Wind. Each hazard is scored 0–100 by likelihood and expected impact.
- Is Chesterfield County good for solar power?
- Chesterfield County has a good solar rating. Solar potential is based on average daily irradiance (kWh/m²/day), which determines how much energy rooftop or ground-mounted panels can produce year-round.
- How many edible plants grow in Chesterfield County?
- Our database identifies 62 edible plant species in Chesterfield County based on regional flora data, USDA hardiness zone, and iNaturalist observations. The full field guide includes identification notes, preparation methods, and seasonal availability.
- What is the autonomy score for Chesterfield County?
- Chesterfield County has an autonomy score of 52. This composite score measures local self-reliance potential across water access, food production capacity, energy resources, and supply chain resilience. Higher scores indicate greater potential for self-sufficiency.