County Data
Georgetown County, South Carolina
Self-reliance and preparedness data for Georgetown County
Relatively Moderate
Hazard Risk (17.5/100)
Good
Solar (4.6 kWh/m²/day)
Natural Hazard Risks in Georgetown County
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Lightning | Relatively High | 29.8 |
| Wildfire | Relatively Moderate | 26.2 |
| Coastal Flooding | Relatively Moderate | 22.5 |
| Ice Storm | Relatively Moderate | 22.3 |
| Tornado | Relatively Moderate | 21.4 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index. Scores 0–100, higher = more risk.
Climate Profile
Temperature & Growing Season
| January Avg | 45°F |
Water & Energy
| Annual Precipitation | 2.9″ |
| Solar Potential | 4.6 kWh/m²/day |
| Wind Speed | 3.0 m/s |
| Soil Type | Sandy Loam |
Local Species
62
Edible species
27
Medicinal species
52
Autonomy Score
Get Your Georgetown County Guide
Enter any zip code in Georgetown County for a full location-specific guide with planting calendars, foraging data, water strategy, and personalized action plans.
Full guide from $14.99 — printable, offline-ready
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the biggest natural hazards in Georgetown County, South Carolina?
- Georgetown County has an overall hazard rating of Relatively Moderate based on FEMA National Risk Index data. The top threats are Lightning, Wildfire, Coastal Flooding. Each hazard is scored 0–100 by likelihood and expected impact.
- Is Georgetown County good for solar power?
- Georgetown County has a good solar rating. Solar potential is based on average daily irradiance (kWh/m²/day), which determines how much energy rooftop or ground-mounted panels can produce year-round.
- How many edible plants grow in Georgetown County?
- Our database identifies 62 edible plant species in Georgetown County based on regional flora data, USDA hardiness zone, and iNaturalist observations. The full field guide includes identification notes, preparation methods, and seasonal availability.
- What is the autonomy score for Georgetown County?
- Georgetown County has an autonomy score of 52. This composite score measures local self-reliance potential across water access, food production capacity, energy resources, and supply chain resilience. Higher scores indicate greater potential for self-sufficiency.